A.W.E. ~Army Wife Extraordinaire~

Them’s the Rules

Posted by: linr12 on: October 17, 2011

A hotel employee was fired for wearing an American flag pin at work. A lot of people think this is wrong. I disagree.  Here’s why: He was given a choice to remove it or go home.

The company’s handbook, according to everything I have been able to find, says the employee handbook specifies that “no other buttons, badges, pins or insignia’s of any kind are permitted to be worn.” It’s very logical to assume that the employee was aware of this and most likely signed something when he was hired acknowledging receipt of the handbook.

A lot of people argue with the hotel’s opinion saying it’s unpatriotic.  I say the hotel is not being unpatriotic.  There just comes a point where we have to stop coddling everyone’s personal opinion. Today it’s this employee’s decision to wear a flag pin. Tomorrow it’s another employee’s decision to wear a pin in the shape of a cross. I mean, he’s only supporting his love of Jesus Christ, right? Well then we need to allow the next employee to wear a pin supporting her show of support for breast cancer research.

And so on… and so on.

You cannot pick and choose which rule to follow. The hotel was enforcing a rule. The people who are saying this hotel was unfair are probably the same people who say, “But I was only going five miles over the speed limit” when they get a ticket. Yes, but you were still speeding. As a person who is known to go a bit over the speed limit, I know that when (yes when) I get pulled over, I will have no choice but to pay the ticket.

Rules are rules. When you break them, you break them. Deal with the consequences and move on. Or don’t break them.

On Seeing People in a Different Light

Posted by: linr12 on: October 1, 2011

I have always joked that I don’t wear my husband’s rank, I wear his MOS (Military Occupational Specialty). I am extremely proud of my husband’s job. My husband is an infantryman. Basically when others are trained to avoid fighting or maybe shy away from it, he’s trained to run straight for it, to put it in the most simple terms.

 Over the past few weeks, I have met and started to get to know quite a few chaplains’ wives. Two of them in particular are spectacularly wonderful. Funny, down-to-earth and… well.. human. WHAT? Human? Chaplains’ wives? I know, right? I knew my husband’s last Chaplain’s wive in passing. It wasn’t because she wasn’t approachable. It was because I thought she wasn’t.

 Last week during a meeting, I jokingly told one of them that she needed to behave because she was a Chaplain’s wive. I’m not sure why, but it occurred to me then that as much as I valued her as a person I saw her first as just that: A Chaplain’s wife.

 While knowing what I know about both of these women, I am almost positive neither one of them consider their husband’s title or position of Chaplain a burden. However, I wonder if the title of “Chaplain’s wife” can be? To be viewed as an extension of your husband’s career at all times can be exhausting – and that can be how the Army is. But to be considered an extension of your husband’s career at such a high level? No matter how devoted to your faith you are? I cannot even begin to imagine.

 As an infantryman’s wife, after all, I’m not expected to start talking about guns, fighting positions, clearing rooms or things such as that. If I were in a situation where firepower were needed, no one would turn to me and yell, “YOU’RE AN INFANTRYMAN’S WIFE… DO SOMETHING!!!” Frankly, if someone counted on me for protection in a physical form, they would be sadly disappointed.

 I have the luxury of being proud of my husband. Of boasting of his career choices and job, without the added and potential burden of always having to be “on” in public.

 Again, I’m sure it’s not a burden to them – or if it is, it’s not an ongoing, life-altering one – it just came to my mind recently that Chaplains’ wives may carry a bit more of a burden than many wives in the military realize.

Are the Good Guys Winning

Posted by: linr12 on: September 11, 2011

How do you explain 9/11 to a seven year old who has watched his father deploy twice in support of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom?

I’m good with words, I’d like to think. Yet explaining things of this magnitude to my son stump me.

He knows evil exists. He calls evil “bad guys.”

I explained to him how bad guys flew planes into the World Trade Center. I explained about the bad guys on Flight 93. I explained about the Pentagon. I tried to used terms he could understand.

The problem was: How could I use terms he could understand when 10 years later I still don’t understand? When I know it happened. When I remember the day as if it were yesterday, but it all seems surreal?

After I was done explaining he looked at me with tears in his eyes and said, “So Daddy deploys because of a plane and building?!” The tone of his voice incredulous. As if it was the most ridiculous reason he could think of to have his daddy ripped from him. I realized that my usually compassionate son could not grasp what had happened.

I gently explained it was more than that — far more. I tried again to explain about terrorists. Maybe he understood better this time.

So he asked the question, “Are the good guys winning, Mama?”

I answered without hesitation, “Yes, Son. We’re winning. The good guys are winning.”

Did You Hear the One About the Muslims?

Posted by: linr12 on: July 26, 2011

Earlier this week I received this joke:

I was sitting at the traffic light on the road yesterday next to a car load of Muslims when a big semi-trailer drove right over the top of their car!

 ”Wow!” I thought, “That could’ve been me”… so I went and got a truck driving license.

Pretty funny, right? Not so much, actually. I was pretty offended. Suppose the joke substituted the word Muslims with Christians. Or Jews. Or Blacks. Or Mormons. The fact that 9/11 happened nearly 10 years ago and jokes like this are still being circulated by otherwise caring, educated and wise people appall me. By people I consider friends. It’s ignorance plain and simple.

 To those who say, “But Muslims flew the planes into the World Trade Center,” I say, “No. No they did not.”  Terrorists committed this act. They may have claimed they were Muslims, but from everything I can tell, they were no more true Muslims than Timothy McVeigh was a Christian.

You remember Timothy McVeigh, don’t you? The white, American male who was responsible for the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Building. The act that killed a great many Americans. He, too, was a terrorist. An American terrorist who had been raised believe in God. (For the sake of simplicity, I won’t get into the fact that God can be defined so many different ways by so many different religions.)

 For this post, I was going to add a list of famous American Muslims. Maybe link a few sites so people could educate themselves. Then I realized: If nearly 10 years later people are still passing jokes around thinking a car full of Muslims being killed is funny, my few links will not change a thing.

 Though here’s a challenge. Do you know a Muslim? I would imagine you do. Talk with your Muslim friends or acquaintances. Learn more about their beliefs. You may be surprised at how their beliefs parallel yours.

NOTE:   I had this entry ready to post the evening before  Anders Behring Breivik  killed 76 people.  Quite timely.

Amy Winehouse is Jerry Orbach

Posted by: linr12 on: July 24, 2011

 

Because we are twisted, my husband, daughter and I have a weird tradition: When someone dies –typically a celebrity– they are “Orbach” or “Orbached.” As in Jerry Orbach.

 

This all began back in when Jerry Orbach died. Apparently my daughter, a huge Dirty Dancing fan, had the hardest time accepting that Baby’s dad was dead. It took us a while to convince her that Jerry Orbach was, in fact, dead. For a while, I thought grief counseling might be needed. From that point on, we referred to deceased celebrities as  Jerry Orbach or some variation.

 

It’s become some macabre competition as to who can notify whom quicker that someone has become Orbached.

 

Yesterday my daughter texted me that Amy Winehouse was Orbach. I was not surprised. Sad, but not surprised.

 

What has surprised me is that people are surprised. Or shocked. Really? I’ll be surprised if it comes out that it was anything non-drugged related — like a spider bite. Anything else? Not so surprising, folks. This woman sparred with addiction for years. I won’t say battled because, let’s face it, she didn’t exactly battle addiction. She more had a slap fight with it.

 

Her talent was amazing. Everyone who worked with her said as much. Addiction is a horrendous thing. I wish Amy Winehouse had lived far longer before she had Orbached.

 

RIP Amy Winehouse.  You join the ranks of some very talented people gone too soon.

The Douche Principle

Posted by: linr12 on: July 6, 2011

While stopped at a light yesterday, Gary and I witnessed a crime. Sadly, this crime is not one yet recognized by any Court. A male over the age of nine months old walked out of Starbucks with his lady friend wearing the following: a pink polo shirt, plaid shorts, loafers with no socks and sunglasses. Let me add the sunglasses weren’t perched daintily on Chad’s nose (I’m positive his name was Chad). Oh no, they were on his neck… the back of his neck… backwards.

I looked at Gary and said, “You know? That guy’s a douche. I just know he is. I can feel it. You know he bought that pink shirt out of the L.L.Bean catalog but called it “watermelon” or “salmon.” He certainly didn’t say, “Oh hey look! I’m going to buy this PINK shirt.”

Then the light changed. Just in time for Chad, I might add. I had decided right then and there that Gary should get out of the car and rough Chad up.

“Men should be allowed the beat the crap out of other dudes based on the Douche Principle.” I declared to Gary with great conviction.

Gary, having just worked 24 hours and slept maybe four hours, just sort of looked at me. I was a bit surprised. Usually he’s all for random acts of violence. So I explained the Douche Principle:

If any self-respecting man witnesses the following offenses being committed by another male over a certain age, he may beat the tar out of the other fellow with impunity:

 

♦ Wearing a polo shirt that was purchased with the color being described as watermelon, mint, tangerine, coral, beeswax — or any variation — rather than pink, green, orange, pink (again) or yellow.

♦Any polo shirt, regardless of color, with a popped/flipped color. Really? Is this the 80’s, gentlemen?

 

 

♦Watermelon/mint/tangerine/coral/beeswax shirt with plaid shorts and loafers/boat shoes. Need I say more?

 

 

 

♦Sunglasses worn backwards on one’s neck. While I understand the need to prevent your neck from becoming too red, there is such an invention as sunscreen. It can be purchased at any drugstore. Heck, I bet that fancy face cream you use has SPF15 that can be applied to the back of your pretty neck, Chad.

 

 

 

 

♦A bracelet. Unless it’s a medical alert bracelet or KIA/POW bracelet. Why, oh why, would a grown man need a bracelet. The same could be said for multiple necklaces and crucifixes. I can see maybe one crucifix if you’re Catholic, but even then I’m not sure that’s Pope-approved (I have an email in to the Vatican for clarification).

♦Shorts, a t-shirt and a sports coat. What’s the matter? Were you unsure of today’s events? Were you maybe going to be casual? Maybe going to a business meeting? Is this your way of showing the world that hey, you play by your *own* rules?

 

 

 

 

 

 

♦Calling every male person he sees or meets “Bra” or “Bro.” This may be waived in certain surfing regions as I understand this to be a cultural thing.

♦Wearing his class ring. Waiver grudgingly given for up to two years post graduation. This does not apply to high school rings, which should actually never be worn by a male. High school rings for guys are strictly provided for them to give to their simpering girlfriends to wear so they don’t have to buy engagement rings but can still get laid. WHAT?? I speak the truth people.

For the above offenses, a douche can be pummeled. Not to death or permanent injury. Just a roughing up.

Now, let’s be clear, two douches may not pounce on each other. Gary pointed out this would be very ineffective. It would be like two first grade girls fighting — a bunch of silly little slaps. Good point. Though, what if Douche 1 ran into Douche 2 wearing the same <gasp> beeswax polo at Panera during lunch rush? Hmmm, I’ll have to revisit this one later.

When Self-Respecting Man (SRM) beats the crap out of Douche Man, the police may not understand what’s going on and arrest SRM. This is acknowledged. However, once this all goes to Court and SRM says, “Your Honor, Douche Man was wearing/doing <insert applicable Douche Principle here>.” The judge will immediately drop all charges.

Indeed, the Douche Principle would be a good thing to have.

AT*EASE

Posted by: linr12 on: June 30, 2011

At ease: Used as a command for troops to assume a relaxed position

So there I was: at a new post, an ineffective — to put it kindly — Family Readiness Group (FRG), lonely, away from my grown daughter and, quite frankly wilting. My husband was working so many hours we both agreed it would be easier if he were deployed (a sentiment echoed by many Drill Sergeant families).

Through the miracle of Facebook (that Mark Zuckerberg is quite the whippersnapper is he not?) I had met a few other DS wives. Once a month, I would see they would attend an AT*EASE event. I would often RSVP with every intention of going. Yet, never attended. I’m the Queen of Excuses (actually, I’m the Queen of Many things if you read through my blog. My Queendom is quite vast)

But I digress.

 

This past December, I attended my first AT*EASE event. Would it be too cliché to say my life here at Ft. Jackson changed after attending? Well if it is, let the cliché bell ring. Because that is exactly what happened, my dears.

 

I saw women in the same situation as I having genuine fun. Fun! Women I knew for a fact did not like each other were actually sitting at the same table and genuinely laughing and joking — WITH EACH OTHER!! It was amazing.

 

Here’s the most amazing part: This is not an Army-sponsored group. It was all started by one woman. Tiffany Moss.  Tiffany, too, was a Drill Sergeant wife. She saw a need, she filled it. She didn’t just whine and stomp her feet in frustration (though she might have done that too, who knows. She’s feisty). She took action. Her grass roots effort took off.

 

AT*EASE is now a two-year old program. I’m proud to say I am a big part of AT*EASE. The new director, Stacie Beecher, trusts me with tasks I sometimes don‘t feel I should be trusted with. In essences, I‘m finding myself again. After feeling lost and alone for so long, the one meeting was the catalyst for change.

 

AT*EASE is now taking off at Ft. Bliss and Ft. Carson thanks to Tiffany and another fabulous, amazing Army wife, Kasey Tanner.

 

If you’re currently at Ft. Jackson, our Facebook page can be found here.   If you are at Ft. Bliss or Ft. Carson, leave a comment and I can put you in touch with Tiffany or Kasey.

 

Tiffany Mitchell Moss, I’ve told you before, but you are an ICON. You’re amazing. You change lives without knowing it. Thank you, my friend.

 

 At ease: The condition of being comfortable or relieved.

Then There Was HAT

Posted by: linr12 on: June 29, 2011

Being the wife a Drill Sergeant is unique. First, you have to get used to the new hat. The campaign hat. The brown round. The Smokey Bear hat. I think you get the picture. That darn hat takes up a lot more room than the typical Army headgear.

When you go out to eat, for instance, your husband cannot just fold it and tuck it in his pocket. Nope, it has to be neatly placed on a chair or table. My husband has actually taken to calling his hat, “Hat.” Yup, Hat. As if it is a being. When we go out, Hat gets a chair. He’s been known to place Hat on our son’s booster seat if our son’s not riding with us. At the grocery store, Hat rides in the front like a small child.

Hat has mystical powers, as well. A newly-graduated private automatically moves out of the way in a crowded PX. I’ve actually heard a few yell, “make way.” As a woman who has illusions (yes, illusions, not delusions) of grandeur, the sight of the crowds parting for me is a delightful sight. I conveniently ignore the fact they are actually parting for Hat and not me.

Hat has a special bed — a hat press. Hat rests here at night so as to keep the brim flat and round. Apparently this is to keep Hat’s intimidation factor at its maximum. You don’t find this with the normal Army headgear. The berets and patrol caps (PC’s) just fall where they may.

To be sure, Hat is very unique and special. I’m almost surprised it doesn’t sparkle in the sunlight.

Between you and me? I don’t much like Hat. Maybe it’s what Hat stands for — the hours away from me that my husband must spend as a Drill Sergeant. The way the time as a Drill Sergeant has aged my husband. Or just maybe the fact that Hat covers too much of my husband’s gorgeous face. Who knows? I just much prefer another form of headgear for my husband.

Him in his younger 82nd Airborne Paratrooper days. Now THAT’s the headgear I prefer.  Though, truth be told, the sight of him often makes my heart skip a beat. He’s still gorgeous to me after all these years.

What Will it Take for Change?

Posted by: linr12 on: June 25, 2011

How many United States Army Drill Sergeants need to kill themselves before the Army cares? If someone would put out a number, there are quite a few right on the brink that will make that ultimate sacrifice for their Battle Buddies in order to get the word out that the system is broken. Now to be clear, I’m not advocating suicide by any means. Yet, nothing else seemed to work for recruiters until a rash of suicides.

A quick check of Google using “recruiters suicides” will turn up the story of the Army probing 17 suicides being 2001 – 2009. Since then, standards and conditions have been much better for recruiters.

You do a check for “Drill Sergeant suicides” and you find stories for “Full Metal Jacket” and how Drill Sergeants are trained to look for suicide indicators. Does this mean Drill Sergeants are not committing suicide? Quite the opposite.

The world of being a Drill Sergeant is demanding. The world of being a Drill Sergeant spouse is demanding, frustrating, rewarding and crushing. My husband has been “on the trail” — the phrase used to describe Drill Sergeant duty — for nearly 18 months. The entire time he has been on the trail, we have heard that things will get better for Drill Sergeants and their families. Changes are coming, we are assured.

Maybe we were remiss in not asking for a definition of the word better. I have always understood the word to mean an improvement over my current situation. Rather than getting better, it has become substantially worse. Especially here at Ft. Jackson, South Carolina.

Every time I think it can’t get worse, I’m quite mistaken.

For those not familiar with Basic Combat Training, here’s a rundown: there are three phases. Red, White and Blue. Each phase, the Soldiers in Training (SIT’s) get more responsibility and, in theory, the Drill Sergeants should have more time off work. For the first year or so, my husband worked at least 16 hour days during Red Phase, including Saturday and some Sundays. I hate it, but understood it as an evil necessity. When White Phase came along, he would work maybe 12 hours, with maybe two Saturdays and rarely Sundays. Blue Phases were short but he was home far more often. Then there were cycle breaks, where there were no SIT’s and he was home a lot.

As in any Army unit, changes of command happen. My husband’s unit had one. The new command has decided, apparently, Drill Sergeants need to work far more hours. My husband now works so many hours, I go days not seeing him for more than a few minutes. His nails are chewed to the quick. He is stressed beyond his limit. So are all of his fellow Drill Sergeants. No one can continue at this pace.

They are told they cannot drink water from a plastic bottle. Oh no, they must drink from canteens like the SIT’s. They are treated, basically, like Privates in Basic Training. Let’s not forget these men and women — the Drill Sergeants have been in the Army no less than five years. Usually far more. My husband has been in 12 years. Been to combat twice. Most Drill Sergeants have. I know quite a few Drill sergeants with Purple Hearts. But they can’t drink water from a plastic bottle in front of brand new trainees. Or use their cell phones. Why? Because they’re put on the same level as the brand new ones are.

Family time is a joke to the command. I know my husband’s Battalion Commander couldn’t care less. His wife is clueless about what enlisted people go through. Heck, she even laughed and admitted she never bothered to learn enlisted people’s rank. While there’s no reason why she would’ve needed to know the ranks, why OH WHY would you just admit that in a meeting filled with enlisted family members? Because you clearly have no concept of what we go through.

The list could go on and on. But really, why bother? I’ve lost hope. I knew one Drill Sergeant before she became a DS. She no longer smiles everyday. That’s what this life does to you.

Their morale is low. But who cares? No one cares. That’s who. But we’re told, “Things will get better!!!!” For 18 months I’ve been told THINGS WILL GET BETTER. I don’t think they will.

So now my question is: How many Drill Sergeants have to kill themselves to make the Army care. Let the TRADOC world know. By the way, my husband is totally not one on the edge to kill himself. He would be the first to try to stop someone from doing it, as well. I reiterate that I am not advocating suicide. This just seems to be the ONLY way the Army listens.   Sure, they have “sensing sessions” where we sit and pour our feelings out.  Yet, it was told to one of the wives by the Post Garrison’s wife that her husband was “sick and tired of the Drill Sergeant’s whining.” 

So, yeah, just let us know.

**What you can do to help:  Write to your state representative and ask them what they are doing to make sure Drill Sergeants are being taken care of like Recruiters are.  Let’s make this a priority before suicides become the answer for too many**

 

Battle Hymn of a Monkey Mother

Posted by: linr12 on: January 24, 2011

Recently I stumbled upon a review of the book Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother  by Amy Chua.  A “tiger mother” is a mother who raises her children with little outwards love and quite a bit of discipline. Ms. Chua actually rejected a hand drawn birthday card from her daughter because, in her words, the daughter could do better. She didn’t allow time for friends or sleepovers. To be sure, her children are quite successful students.

Ya know what? Good for her… I guess. I refuse to be that kind of parent. I suppose I’m more of a ferret mother? Kangaroo mother? A monkey mother? I have no idea. I know I can be a little too over-protective — I actually had one friend make a helicopter sound at me when I worried about my son’s proximity to me while we were at a park. I also know I can be a little lazy in my parenting. The two hours of TV a day rule? Eh… I’m not always strict about that. Some days he spends way more than that. Some days he sees no TV. I also do many fun and creative things with him — crafts, baking, walks, scavenger hunts… the list could go on for quite a while.

What I do know about my son is that he’s well-adjusted. Despite things that could have caused him to be maladjusted. He is quite creative. At seven years old, he’s created his own little comic book hero and draws stories about him. He’s compassionate. When he was told that his older sister — having just had a new baby — may not be able to spoil him as much due to finances, he ran upstairs and grabbed his piggy bank. The reason? He wanted to send it all to his sissy so that she could have more money for the baby. His grades in school are the highest marks he can get in first grade. The problems he has are usually involving talking too much (hmmm.. Wonder where he gets THAT).

Tiger parenting might become the new rage. Who knows. As for me? Tigers are ok to look at in the zoo; however, they’ve never been my favorite animal. I’ve always preferred the monkey house.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.