Posted by: linr12 on: October 17, 2011
A hotel employee was fired for wearing an American flag pin at work. A lot of people think this is wrong. I disagree. Here’s why: He was given a choice to remove it or go home.
The company’s handbook, according to everything I have been able to find, says the employee handbook specifies that “no other buttons, badges, pins or insignia’s of any kind are permitted to be worn.” It’s very logical to assume that the employee was aware of this and most likely signed something when he was hired acknowledging receipt of the handbook.
A lot of people argue with the hotel’s opinion saying it’s unpatriotic. I say the hotel is not being unpatriotic. There just comes a point where we have to stop coddling everyone’s personal opinion. Today it’s this employee’s decision to wear a flag pin. Tomorrow it’s another employee’s decision to wear a pin in the shape of a cross. I mean, he’s only supporting his love of Jesus Christ, right? Well then we need to allow the next employee to wear a pin supporting her show of support for breast cancer research.
And so on… and so on.
You cannot pick and choose which rule to follow. The hotel was enforcing a rule. The people who are saying this hotel was unfair are probably the same people who say, “But I was only going five miles over the speed limit” when they get a ticket. Yes, but you were still speeding. As a person who is known to go a bit over the speed limit, I know that when (yes when) I get pulled over, I will have no choice but to pay the ticket.
Rules are rules. When you break them, you break them. Deal with the consequences and move on. Or don’t break them.
Do you have a place available for personal messages? I’d love to talk to you
-Soldiersgirl
I agree that if there was a dress, he shouldn’t be wearing the pin. If he didn’t know about the dress code but was later informed then he should have removed the pin and continued working. However, with that being said…Your comment about pariotism…I feel differently in that aspect. I think it does violate our consitution. This falls under the “freedom of speech” act, this guy can be patriotic all he wants and if it offends others than oh well to bad for them. I guess they don’t need to look at him. Going 5 miles over the speed limit is not the same thing as showing your support for whatever it may. You said that people who support Jesus Christ could then wear a pin…they have that right (according to the constitution) and it’s called “freedom of religion”, “freedom of speech”, etc. As I said this man has to follow his jobs rules but you make it sound like people should not be allowed, regardeless of where it might be to display how they feel about certain things…wrong…we have rights for a reason and people who don’t agree son’t have to pay that person any mind.
As many people do you totally get the 1st Amendment wrong. The 1st Amendment states that CONGRESS shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion or the free practice thereof. CONGRESS can’t make a law, it says nothing about private institutions making rules concerning their employees. As to freedom of speech, the Supreme Court has ruled that employers may indeed limit their employees freedom of speech, citing again the 1st Amendment that states CONGRESS shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech.
October 20, 2011 at 5:45 am
If the pin wasn’t part of his uniform and there is a dress code on file that states he can’t wear pins, then he can’t wear pins. If he chose to wear a pin, regardless of what was depicted on it, then he was in violation of the dress code. If they gave him the option to remove it or be fired and he chose not to remove then he chose his own outcome. I don’t see why he’s bothering fighting the policy. Company’s get to decide how their employees dress. If you don’t agree with it then you don’t have to work there.